Home/News & Insights/Studies find; Hedge Fund Managers with “skin in the game” ou…
Company News

Studies find; Hedge Fund Managers with “skin in the game” outperform

AlternativeSoft

Funds which rely more on insider money outperform funds that use asset gathering

Hedge Fund Managers with “skin in the game” outperform

NYU and Columbia University found that funds where the Hedge Fund Manager had skin in the game outperform but tend to keep small funds. These funds not only earn more but are less sensitive to performance driven flows.
You can read that paper here.
The research was carried out using HFR, EurekaHedge, eVestment and CISDM. Authors of the paper Arpit Gupta and Kunal Sachdeva, looked at the characteristics of investors and the performance of 720 Hedge Funds.
They found that funds with no outside capital earned 4.3% higher excess returns annually compared to funds with only outside investment. Additionally, they found that these funds were comparatively small and outperformed on a risk adjusted basis. Just one-standard-deviation increase in investment resulted in 1.4% to 1.7% in excess returns annually.

What is causing this?

Gupta and Sachdeva believe one possible reason could be, Hedge Fund Managers prioritise those funds that contain more of their personal investments, putting those funds under the control of their best portfolio managers.
Alternatively, they believe that inside investors are better informed about managerial ability within the fund family. Therefore, they allocate their capital to the better fund managers.
In short both researchers believed that having managers and investors better aligned over incentives could only generate positive results.

Smaller funds

The data also found that these firms deliberately remained as smaller funds even when the opportunity to attain more assets was on the table.
When more than 20% of funds were owned by insiders, managers did not raise more capital even after periods of positive excess performance. Intriguingly they continued to outperform for longer than funds that did see additional inflows.
This cap being put on outside investment is motivated by Hedge Fund Managers having their own money on the line as they desire better performance and high returns.
Gupta and Sachdeva surmised that Funds which rely more on insider money outperform funds which do not eat their own cooking.

To find out more or register for a free demo, get in touch with our team.

This article was published in Aug 2019. Figures, fund names and market references reflect that date; the analytical methods described are available in the current AlternativeSoft platform.
Request a Demo

See AlternativeSoft
in Action

Join 150+ institutional investors who rely on AlternativeSoft to select and monitor funds. Book a personalised demo with our team today.

  • Live walkthrough of the full platform
  • Tailored to your asset class - hedge funds, mutual funds or private markets
  • Q&A with our investment analytics specialists
  • Free trial access available following the demo
  • Dedicated onboarding and implementation support
Hedgeweek Best Risk Management Software: voted by clients 4 years running
Data integrations include:
Bloomberg eVestment Morningstar Preqin Pitchbook HFR

Book Your Demo

Complete the form and we'll respond within one business day.

Book a DemoFree trial after the demo. Reply within one business day.